![]() ![]() Wade, unwinding the constitutional right to an abortion recognized since 1973. In its last term, the Supreme Court reversed its landmark decision in Roe v. The ruling is the latest in which the Supreme Court's conservative majority has upended decades of past decisions involving issues that have shaped American life, underscoring the impact that former President Donald Trump's three appointed justices have had on the court. Bollinger - Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion that the 2003 decision is "for all intents and purposes, overruled," while Sotomayor accused the conservative majority of "overruling decades of precedent." Though Roberts' majority opinion did not explicitly overturn the court's precedent allowing schools to consider race when making admissions decisions - namely a 2003 case known as Grutter v. ![]() "Thus, the Court's meddling not only arrests the noble generational project that America's universities are attempting, it also launches, in effect, a dismally misinformed sociological experiment." Upending past Supreme Court decisions "Simply put, the race-blind admissions stance the Court mandates from this day forward is unmoored from critical real-life circumstances," she wrote. In a separate dissent penned in the University of North Carolina case, Jackson, the first Black woman to sit on the Supreme Court, lambasted the court's decision, writing that the majority "surges to vindicate equality, but Don Quixote style - pitifully perceiving itself as the sole vanguard of legal high ground when, in reality, its perspective is not constitutionally compelled." Read the full text of the dissents on affirmative action ruling by Sotomayor and Jackson.Read full text of the Supreme Court affirmative action ruling.Joined by Justice Elena Kagan and Jackson, Sotomayor said the court's decision "subverts the constitutional guarantee of equal protection by further entrenching racial inequality in education, the very foundation of our democratic government and pluralistic society." "In so holding, the Court cements a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society where race has always mattered and continues to matter." A group of people wear face masks to protect against air pollution as they walk past the Supreme Court Building on June 29, 2023, in Washington, D.C. It holds that race can no longer be used in a limited way in college admissions to achieve such critical benefits," she wrote. "Today, this Court stands in the way and rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress. In a fierce dissent, Sotomayor said the majority opinion is "not grounded in law or fact and contravenes the vision of equality embodied in the Fourteenth Amendment." Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice." "And in doing so, they have concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual's identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. "Many universities have for too long done just the opposite," Roberts said. We have never permitted admissions programs to work in that way, and we will not do so today." "Both programs lack sufficiently focused and measurable objectives warranting the use of race, unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points. "The Harvard and UNC admissions programs cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause," Roberts wrote. Justice Sonia Sotomayor also read her dissent aloud, the first time a dissenting justice has done so this term. Thomas read a concurring opinion from the bench. Chief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The court ruled 6-3 along ideological lines in the University of North Carolina case, and 6-2 in the Harvard dispute, as Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recused herself. Washington - The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that race-conscious admission policies of Harvard College and the University of North Carolina violate the Constitution, bringing an end to affirmative action in higher education in a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |